On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 05:17:08PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:58:55AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013, at 7:50, Ben Laurie wrote: > > > > > > Hmmm. pkg updating doesn't actually show the relevant 20130206 entry - > > > so not actually useful. > > > > > > > pkg updating literally just reads /usr/ports/UPDATING... is your ports > > tree up to date? Did the committer of this tcl incident commit the > > changes before touching UPDATING and you're caught inbetween? I suppose > > this could use a bit of investigation... > > pkg updating tries match the installed packages origin in AFFECTS line, via > strstr, in that case it does not match that is why it fails at showing it up. > > I'm fixing the UPDATING entry.
In fact that would mean too many entries in AFFECTS. Best would be to improve pkg updating matching. regards, Bapt
pgpvZvlgSOzxy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
