On 6 Jun 2013 18:27, "Matthias Andree" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am 06.06.2013 19:14, schrieb Chris Rees: > > On 6 June 2013 16:11, Ganael LAPLANCHE <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 16:07:08 +0100 (BST), Anton Shterenlikht wrote > >> > >>> yes, this helps on ia64, thank you. > >>> Probably will help on amd64, will check later. > >>> Sorry for not thinking about is myself, > >>> I just tried to update with portmaster, as usual. > >> > >> Tested on amd64, I can reproduce the problem. > >> > >> I'll have a look at that, thanks for reporting the problem. > >> > > > > Usual approach is: > > > > CONFLICTS_BUILD= ${PKGBASE}-[0-9]* > > > > which clearly informs the user that's what s/he has to do. > > What an unfortunate situation, and especially recommendation. > > I'd propose that the build be fixed so it prefers the local headers from > the distfiles, rather than the older ones in the system.
That's the proper fix- sorry I was unclear there; I meant if it can't be fixed easily. Chris > Can we please put that into the porter's handbook as a test requirement, > à la "installed older version of the port must not break the build of a > newer version"? This is a frequent nuisance. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
