On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 05:56:36PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > Hi, > > autoconf/automake-configure using ports fail to build on amd64 (not on > i386), as witnessed with the current pcre-8.33 port (and more, if you test > for it). > "make configure" (ultimatively, ./configure) bails out with > > checking build system type... Invalid configuration > `amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1': machine `amd64-portbld' not recognized > configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1 failed > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > > > Comparing an "original" config.sub (e.g. from pcre again) to the one > supplied in ports/Templates/config.sub, one cannot really miss the diff: > > --- /usr/ports/Templates/config.sub 2013-06-04 17:35:53.000000000 +0200 > +++ pcre-8.33/config.sub 2013-05-27 17:56:00.000000000 +0200 > @@ -473,6 +473,12 @@ > basic_machine=a29k-none > os=-bsd > ;; > + amd64) > + basic_machine=x86_64-pc > + ;; > + amd64-*) > + basic_machine=x86_64-`echo $basic_machine | sed 's/^[^-]*-//'` > + ;; > amdahl) > basic_machine=580-amdahl > os=-sysv > > which quite obviously explains the trouble... > > Bapt, you were the last committer on that file, could you please add the > evaporated lines back again? > > Regards, > Christoph > > -- > Spare Space
You might have an old version of the ports tree, I did this commit in: r318882 and reverted it in r318911 because of this mistake, than I now have committed the right one has r319866 Can you confirm that upgrading the ports tree works for you? regards, Bapt
pgpLRZIcPP3ZY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
