On 26/12/2012 12:43 AM, Matthew Rezny wrote: > On 25 Dec, 2012, at 4:49, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > >> On 25/12/2012 1:55 PM, Matthew Rezny wrote: >> >>> The immediate question is, what was the original error that >>> mandated the workaround and does that error still occur with >>> current version of Clang? If the latter is no, can we get rid >>> of the temporary workaround? >> >> This may help provide some answers: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/171542 >> > Thank you for the suggestion. However, the topic of that PR is > disabling PGO to build with Clang. I had already turned off the PGO > option before the first build attempt, and the problem I faced was > the insistence upon calling the non-existent GCC regardless of > chosen port options.
I referenced the PR as an additional information source, as I wasn't entirely sure what issue you were facing without logs to reference. I should have been more explicit than 'may help' and will do my best next time. Ta, Koobs _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
