On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:10:25AM +0200, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2012-09-26 01:13, Eitan Adler wrote: > > On 25 September 2012 18:45, Garrett Cooper <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Oliver Pinter <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> Hi all! > >>> > >>> This patch fixed the problem, when buildig imake on a machine where > >>> clang is the base the compiler (WITH_CLANG_IS_CC). > >> > >> (Picking a random message to reply to) Why not create PRs and CC the > >> relevant parties? > > The issue, as Jan pointed out in another thread, is that ucpp isn't > compatible with gnu cpp either. It causes other issues, the only > difference is that it passes the configure script test. > In my opinion, the solution to this problem is to fix the (X11) ports > that abuse cpp, and deprecate imake. This is not a solution as well. The imake is usable and used on its own for miriad of proprietary X/motif software. Removing it from ports is no-go.
Not all useful software lives in ports, FYI. > > Also, don't cross post ports issues to current@ > Regards! > -- > Niclas > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
pgpAFw1crTuZU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
