On 2011/11/16 02:56, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +0000:
What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have
sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)?
It is a purposefully no-networking sandbox jail. What networking
activity postconf wants to run?
Wietse, in a post[1] on the Postfix mailing list, lends further credence
to a suspicion that this issue is particular to pointyhat:
Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it
determines the local interfaces and their netmasks).
I have heard about bizarre errors on FreeBSD (jail) systems where the
user-land library was out of sync with kernel-land, resulting in data
structure mis-matches and system calls returning nonsensical results.
[1] http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2011-11/0385.html
That's entirely possible.
Is it a clever idea to hardcode local interfaces on build machine into a
package that will then be redistributed to other machines?
Sounds like postfix will have to do without official packages on FreeBSD
from now on.
--
Pav Lucistnik <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
