On 18/09/2010 01:13, [email protected] wrote: > jhell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ... Mercurial being the distributed version control that it is >> allows you to clone, make the changes you need to the clone test it >> thoroughly and then either push or pull them to the main tree ... > > At the risk of starting the VCS variant of the vi vs emacs wars :) > why Mercurial (rather than, say, GIT or SVK)? > > And no, I have nothing against Mercurial. I don't know _any_ > distributed VCS well enough to have an opinion of which would > be best suited.
There is great documentation and re-education material (for SVN users) out there for Mercurial. But this is not going to happen any way. The ports are still stuck with _CVS_. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
