On 08/20/2010 16:31, Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 4:16 PM -0700 8/20/10, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
Nonetheless, I'll try to look on what I can do. But I can't promise anything,
because
this is really something that should be done on ruby side.
Thanks. You may get some pushback because other package systems don't do the equivalent of "make deinstall; make
reinstall", but it is worth asking. I alway think of "make install" as "push the binaries that we
just made into the proper places", not "make some more stuff and then push".
I agree that having ports which create new stuff in the install phase is
sub-optimal, but ruby is far from alone here. OTOH what may be useful is
separating the docs into their own port.
hth,
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
-- Pablo Picasso
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
