Freddie Cash wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Dominic Fandrey <[email protected]>wrote: > >> ... >> >> Would such a thing be accepted? I feel sceptical, because it does >> not even depend on several packages and the real solution in my >> opinion would be if people searched the ports tree with >> "make quicksearch cat=ports-mgmt" instead of browsing the file >> system. But they don't and I know of no way making them do it. >> > > You could always split out the common code into a library port, and make > that a dependency for the pkg_upgrade and bsdadminscripts ports.
Yes, I could. Do you think it makes sense to split a package that is smaller than 100kB into several smaller packages? -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
