On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Jeremy Messenger wrote: JM> > JMC> > JMC> > Another question: is there a way to avoid apache22 install JM> > (i have apache13 JM> > JMC> > JMC> > installed and have no current plans to upgrade) ? I tried to JM> > chase JM> > JMC> > JMC> > options but failed. JM> > JMC> > JMC> JM> > JMC> > JMC> Not by using the meta-port. This is required for JM> > gnome-user-share which JM> > JMC> > JMC> is now part of the GNOME Desktop. JM> > JMC> > JM> > JMC> > Hmm, so currently there is no way to install gnome2 without JM> > requiring apache22? JM> > JMC> JM> > JMC> Correct. You could, of course, go through the meta-port, and remove JM> > JMC> gnome-user-share on your own (i.e. build your own customized JM> > meta-port). JM> > JM> > Well, would you object to the following quick fix? JM> JM> Wel.. I object. marcus also said that you only can do in your own system, so JM> it means we don't want to add any option in x11/gnome2. We always turn down JM> that kind of patch unless no choice for limit size to build packages in CD JM> for the release.
I hope I understand your intentions, but this is not the first options for the metaport, heh? ;-) My main concern is that many my colleagues work on desktop systems which they are using as sorta "personal websevers" too, not too resource hungry, hence apache 1.3. From the last upgrade the only way to achieve it on a single machine is to split Gnome and apache to separate jails... -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: [email protected] ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- [email protected] *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
