Florent Thoumie wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:08:03 +0100
"Florent Thoumie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Olafur Osvaldsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is something the PR responsible introduced in his original
patch...
It's still present in your version. Anyway, I'm not blaming anyone,
just pointing out what I think is a mistake.
So this is not for the user but for the port?
I'll do a swap on the tree for it, because I'm sure there are more
ports doing something like:
.ifndef(NO_INSTALL_MANPAGES)
......
.endif
I was talking to itectu@ about this, and figured it would be better in
Mk/bsd.port.mk.
The general rule of thumb is: if it doesn't begin with WITH_ or
WITHOUT_, it's not user-settable. NO_INSTALL_MANPAGES is used for
ports using imake that don't understand the install.man target.
/me thought that was the USE_ vs WITH(OUT)?_ difference.
NO* is supposed to be user settable right ?
Now of course there are exceptions (usually for no good reason IMHO).
The likes of NOPORTDOCS/NOPORTEXAMPLES/... could be changed to
WITHOUT_DOCS/WITHOUT_EXAMPLES, it's just waiting for somebody to do
the work.
Heh, maybe, I kind of feel like it will get reject as a style(9) change.
I'm all for it though, not saying I'm going to do it though.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
