Hey Adam-
I think the best course of action would be for you to correct the offending
lines in the Makefile and then open up a PR with the patch. After the
maintainer of the port approves the patch, it can be commited to cvs.
Thanks for catching this.
SK
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:38:50AM -0400, Adam Martin wrote:
> To whom it might concern,
>
> I've started a rebuild of all ports, on my home system, and links
> port failed, with the libdirectfb. I have fixed it -- the dependancy
> line with the "libdirectfb" entry should be changed to "directfb".
>
> Line 51 (as of my last portsnap fetch; portsnap update, a few minutes
> ago) of /usr/ports/www/links/Makefile should read:
>
> LIB_DEPENDS+= directfb:${PORTSDIR}/devel/directfb
>
> Instead it reads:
>
> LIB_DEPENDS+= libdirectfb:${PORTSDIR}/devel/directfb
>
>
> Hopefully this hasn't affected too many people, and hopefully I'm not
> pestering the wrong people.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> ADAM David Alan Martin
>
> Filesystem and Storage Lab, SUNY Stony Brook
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--
Steven Kreuzer
http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"