Hey Adam-

I think the best course of action would be for you to correct the offending
lines in the Makefile and then open up a PR with the patch. After the
maintainer of the port approves the patch, it can be commited to cvs.

Thanks for catching this.

SK

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:38:50AM -0400, Adam Martin wrote:
> To whom it might concern,
> 
>       I've started a rebuild of all ports, on my home system, and links  
> port failed, with the libdirectfb.  I have fixed it -- the dependancy  
> line with the "libdirectfb" entry should be changed to "directfb".
> 
> Line 51 (as of my last portsnap fetch; portsnap update, a few minutes  
> ago) of /usr/ports/www/links/Makefile should read:
> 
> LIB_DEPENDS+=           directfb:${PORTSDIR}/devel/directfb
> 
> Instead it reads:
> 
> LIB_DEPENDS+=           libdirectfb:${PORTSDIR}/devel/directfb
> 
> 
> Hopefully this hasn't affected too many people, and hopefully I'm not  
> pestering the wrong people.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> ADAM David Alan Martin
> 
> Filesystem and Storage Lab, SUNY Stony Brook
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

-- 
Steven Kreuzer
http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to