On Aug 21, 2007, at 2:21 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
Anyway, did you have a specific concern about GPLv3?
I was mostly concerned about local patches which we have 'backported'
from CVS trunk of GNU Emacs to the editors/emacs port, to unbreak GTK+
builds.
Should we sign papers with the FSF to 'distribute' builds of this
port?
Do we need to change anything from the way we handled GPLv2
versions of
GNU Emacs in the Ports tree? .. and so on.
The FSF probably would like people who *submit* substantial patches
to GNU projects to sign a contributor agreement, but of course one
doesn't have to do so in order to use, modify, or even redistribute
GPLv{2,3}'ed code.
It might be the case that pinging <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> would provide
you authoritative feedback from them rather than just my random
opinion.... :-)
--
-Chuck
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
