Garrett Cooper wrote:
Robert Huff wrote:
Vizion writes:
I do not know about that.. If there is a refusal to keep the port
in the tree then the folks at OpenOffice will HAVE to do
something about it.
They will? Why?
While there's no reason to think they want to gratuitously
create bad feelings, FreeBSD machines are a small fraction of the
current (and potential) user base. They could blow off FreeBSD -
heck, *BSD - first thing tomorrow and not notice.
OpenOffice.Org is under no obligation to FreeBSD, or its users,
whatsoever. Of course ... if you want to step up and contribute
patches (or pay someone to do so) then this will get corrected.
Welcome to the underside of open source software.
Robert Huff
What about the Seamonkey headers break OpenOffice though? Sheesh, the
OpenOffice people should know that it's an unsupported browser and bad
to have sitting around on a machine for security reasons (riddled with
security bugs).
Provide me with the perfunctory necessary patches and stuff, and I'll
give compiling it a go with Seamonkey's headers.
-Garrett
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it doesn't appear that mozilla actually
needs to be installed for OOo-2.x-devel and it appears that instead it
just automatically drags in mozilla off the web and compiles portions of
OOo specifically using mozilla's headers.
Either way I'm trying a compile right now and will hopefully get through
without a hitch (even though I'm getting a bit sort on disk space =\..).
-Garrett
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
