On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 01:10:45 -0800 Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned: > > > > Personally, I think linux-kmod-compat or linux-kmod-devkit would > > sound better. BTW, I believe this should live in compat, not devel. > > we don't seem to have a "compat" ports category, don't we ? and i
Yeah, my fault... > don't think this goes into the base system, or at least i don't > have a good clue on the licensing issues yet - there are things i > have rewritten from scratch, there are others (headers mostly, plus > short inline functions) i just copied from GPL sources, > and the modules themselves that you can build generally come > from GPL sources. > Looks reasonable. Furthermore, port is much easier to maintain. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE
pgpAoTRQ0Indz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
