i see but there was no debt that it is possible. at least from my side :_) On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2009/10/20 István <[email protected]>: > > > > therefore i like netpipe runs you can see the performance and the latency > as > > well using the packet size as your "x" axis, i think it makes more sense > > then just 1 number > > My point was to demonstrate that saturating gigabit ethernet is very > doable with FreeBSD, and his limitation is more likely somewhere other > than "TCP". > > I've told him privately to check CPU utilisation. I'll do the same on > my boxes when I get some time; I'd like to know why I'm only seeing ~ > 800mbit with large buffers. > -- the sun shines for all http://l1xl1x.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
