Jeremiah Gowdy wrote: > > > Trouble is there is no consistency in the rulings. > > United States Code Title 17 Chapter 12 Section 1201 Subsection (f) > > My basic interpretation of this is, if you legally own a copy of the > software (firmware is software), you can legally reverse engineer the > software for the purpose of achiving interoperability. Therefore, if you > own a piece of hardware, and you have no driver for the hardware, or the I wonder, if this provision is overriden by the DMCCA (the new proposed and in some places adopted act on software copyrights) ? -SB To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Matt Dillon
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Wes Peters
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Drew Eckhardt
- RE: FreeBSD vs L... SteveB
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Jeremiah Gowdy
- RE: FreeBSD vs L... SteveB
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Marco van de Voort
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Drew Eckhardt
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Wes Peters
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Sergey Babkin
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Rik van Riel
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Sergey Babkin
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Dennis
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Matt Dillon
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Rik van Riel
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Jeremiah Gowdy
- RE: FreeBSD vs. Linux, Solaris, a... SteveB
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux, Solari... Giorgos Keramidas

