On 27 May 2013 03:10, "Daniel Eischen" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 27 May 2013, Teske, Devin wrote: >> >> >> I don't think there's any reason why we have to write it in C if we can write >> it in sh. > > > I don't really care one way or the other (C or sh), but > I can say that I can understand(*) well structured C a lot > better than well structured sh. Having something more > strongly typed certainly helps understanding. > > (*) Assuming some level of complexity (I know that's > subjective).
I think it's all down to familiarity. I suppose sh is more resistant to many stupid bugs and handles strings well.... But it has its own troubles too of course. Chris _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
