Am 02.04.2013 12:13, schrieb Kimmo Paasiala:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[email protected]> wrote:
Wojciech Puchar <[email protected]> writes:
Lev Serebryakov <[email protected]> writes:
It is not exact so. Some Atoms on some motherboards with some
firmwares are 64-bit CPU.
don't know of any now in shops that are not
http://soekris.com/products/net5501.html
http://soekris.com/products/net6501.html
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [email protected]
I am NOT able to understand the merit of these products with respect to
their features and PRICES .
It is possible to assemble much more cheaper full featured PC like systems
( DDR3 memory , 64-bit capable processors , with a disadvantage about power
requirements ) .
Power consumption.
...Space - Price - temperature, easy to use, no Fans, no Noise...
I was surprised about this discussion and first thought, its some kind
of april joke.
Everybody talks about cheap new 64 bit hardware
But how about the hardware people are actualy using? In our datacenter
we are running (beside 64bit machines) a large amount of 32bit servers.
We have a room full of spare parts, spare servers...
And we have no reason to change them to 64bit hardware. HP, IBM, they
all run since years and i am shure, they make 5-10 more years :-)
And we dont want to stop using FreeBSD after V9.x or so.
Dont forget there are a lot of different people with different needs out
there. Not everybody puts his focus on a cheap desktop PC thats thrown
away after 3 years
Achim
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
