On 05.03.13 17:53, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Alfred,
> I'm not sure if kqueue support this, however adding such a facility > might be OK. thanks for your reply. What would be the correct place to suggest such a change? > The only pain here is that it requires managing a doubly linked list and > additional pointer dereferences. Which seems extra absurd in the light of a performant implementation already handling all this - within the kqueue. And it still does not solve my problem that for every operation on my allocation I need to update pointers both in the kqueue and in my linked list. Regards, erdgeist _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
