On 23 Jan 2013 20:23, "Wojciech Puchar" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> While RAID-Z is already a king of bad performance, >> >> >> I don't believe RAID-Z is any worse than RAID5. Do you have any actual >> measurements to back up your claim? > > > it is clearly described even in ZFS papers. Both on reads and writes it gives single drive random I/O performance.
So we have to take your word for it? Provide a link if you're going to make assertions, or they're no more than your own opinion. Chris _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
