On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Richard Sharpe wrote:
[ ... ]
Well, it turns out that your suggestion was correct.
I did some more searching and found another similar suggestion, so I
gave it a whirl, and it works.
Now, my problem is that Jeremy Allison thinks that it is a fugly hack.
This means that I will probably have big problems getting a patch for
this into Samba.
I don't understand why JA thinks this is a hack. Their current
method doesn't work, or at least isn't portable. I've tried this
on Solaris 10, and it works just as it does in FreeBSD. Test
program included after signature.
$ ./test_sigprocmask
Sending signal 16
Got signal 16, blocked: true
Blocking signal 16 using method 0
Handled signal 16, blocked: false
Sending signal 16
Got signal 16, blocked: true
Blocking signal 16 using method 1
Handled signal 16, blocked: true
Weird - I just tested it on Linux (2.6.18-238.el5) and it works
the same as FreeBSD and Solaris. Am I misunderstanding something?
Is it possible that Samba's code is broken on all platforms?
--
DE
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
