On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 09:29:27PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > > I don't think performance will be much different but if so, UFS1 would > > be (sightly) faster than UFS2 because one page read will get more inodes > > from disk and 32 bit (UFS1) arithmetic may be slightly faster than 64 bit > > (UFS2). > > thanks for answer i was looking for! i will rebuild FS to UFS1, saving ca > 1GB for inodes.
Also, look at the -i option of newfs, for many purposes the default number of inodes it allocates is far more than sufficient > > If performance is an issue, consider turning off atime updates or even > > mount the filesystem read-only if possible. > i always turn off atime and use softupdates. > > it cannot be readonly. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
