On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 02:33:00 -0800 Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Chris Rees <[email protected]> wrote: > >
> > I recall a cluster administrator advising use of svn protocol > > rather than http. Something to do with overheads. > > Yes, you're right. http opens a connection per-file, which is > horrendous with server load and is very slow as HTTP isn't optimized > for this purpose Presumably that's a limitation of the library or subversion because it's not true of HTTP per se. Portsnap, for example, uses persistent connections with pipelining. > (and the current defacto HTTP library used with svn > isn't the most performant thing in the world). _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
