On 19 Nov 2012 13:05, "Andriy Gapon" <[email protected]> wrote: > > on 18/11/2012 16:17 Chris Rees said the following: > > On 18 November 2012 14:04, Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 18 November 2012 02:48, Andriy Gapon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> What you describe is not a workflow issue, but a local development > >>> environment(s) setup issue. > >> > >> Which is a workflow issue. > >> > >> I mean, we could bang heads on semantics for hours on end, or we can > >> realise that git isn't a magic bullet for FreeBSD development. > > > > Also... did I mention git is GPL? > > Yes, you did, twice now. > I do not see any relevance of Git license to FreeBSD's choice of SCM solution. > But, of course, I am not: > a) a zealot > b) proposing Git (or Subversion, or Mercurial) to be bundled with a base system
I'm disappointed that you choose to call me a zealot- this is a valid concern, especially since we're trying to move away from GPL stuff. Whether it's in base or not, you'd still be forcing me to install it for development. Why are people so dismissive of this point? Chris _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
