On Friday, March 02, 2012 1:46:37 pm [email protected] wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: John Baldwin <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected], "Roman Divacky" <[email protected]>, "Andriy > Gapon" <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:24:24 -0500 > Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot) > > > On Friday, March 02, 2012 10:17:03 am [email protected] wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: John Baldwin <[email protected]> > > > To: [email protected] > > > Cc: [email protected], "Roman Divacky" <[email protected]>, Andriy > > > Gapon <[email protected]> > > > Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:14:43 -0500 > > > Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot) > > > > > > > > > > > However, avg@ might have found the actual cause of the bug. And > > > > > Roman did > > > > > indeed break this earlier. Try the updated boot2_test.patch again. > > > > > > > > You should still try this. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > John Baldwin > > > > > > > > > > > > > Using patch: MD5 (boot2_test.patch) = 72412f9b47b114302268561f12c1b46b > > > > > > http://www.starforce.biz/stage2boot_1.jpg > > > > > > This is the worst patch as even RE-typing doesn't work. > > > That is, it is completely unable to boot. > > > > > > Throw me another patch! > > > > Ah, was using sizeof() on the wrong thing, and I have a fix for the garbage > > you saw for kname as well. Patch is updated at the normal URL. > > > > > > Please don't treat John this way. He has put in a lot of time for > > > > you, and many others, and is one of THE experts. > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > He didn't got a bad treatment, nor any side is angry. > > > Relax! ;) > > > > Actually, you've been rather rude for the entire thread, I am just doing my > > best to ignore it in the interest of getting the bug fixed. > > > > -- > > John Baldwin > > > > I'm sorry if you think so, especially part where I am rude through the entire > thread. That I can hardly believe. > I am also actively testing and am persistant in solving issue. > Or is problem in my perception?
I think it may just be that your language comes off as being a bit demanding, plus a fair bit of all caps, etc. If English is not your native language then that may also be a factor. If you are not intending to be rude then that is plenty good enough for me. :) > Anyway, yours latest patch has a same md5 hash as a previous one and also > built binary /boot/boot had same md5 hash. > So I've simply skipped installing boot code. Yes, my bad, I updated it locally but forgot to upload it to the URL. It should really be updated now. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
