2012/1/20 Kostik Belousov <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 06:25:42PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: >> I figure this isn't wanted? > You silently ignored part of the notes that were provided,
I fixed the style violations you pointed out and removed _SYS_SYSPROTO_H_ and friends. Which else was there? If I missed something I'm sorry. > and keep > complete silence on the primary question about non-standard I thought I answered that already but I'll try again: I believe the functionality is useful to developers even if it is non-standard. In addition if it is standardized at some point in the future it is unlikely to have different semantics than the ones implemented. > and fractional nature of the patch. How so? I am not including the generated parts in the patch. Should I? > I see no reason to retype my previous response. -- Eitan Adler _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
