On Tuesday, December 13, 2011 7:46:34 am Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: > Hi, > > I am not sure why I am having this problem, but looking > at the code I dont understand uma_core.c really good. > So I hope someone can shed a light on this: > > I am running on an arm board and and running a kernel module > that behaves like a wlan interface. so I tx and rx packets. > > For now tx is only only sending beacon like frames. > This is done through using ieee80211_beacon_alloc(). > > Then in a callout task to generate periodic beacons: > > m_dup(avp->beacon, M_DONTWAIT); > mtx_lock(...); > STAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(...); > taskqueue_enqueue(...); > mtx_unlock(...); > callout_schedule(...); > > On the RX side, the interrupt handler will read out buffer > then place it on a queue to be handled by wlan-glue code. > For now wlan-glue code just frees the mbuf it instead of > calling net80211 ieee80211_input() functions: > > m_copyback(...); > /* Allocate new mbuf for next RX. */ > MGETHDR(..., M_DONTWAIT, MT_DATA); > bzero((mtod(sc->Rx_m, void *)), MHLEN); > sc->Rx_m->m_len = 0; /* NB: m_gethdr does not set */ > sc->Rx_m->m_data += 20; /* make headroom */ > > Then I use a lockmgr inside my kernel module that should > make sure that we either are on TX or RX path.
Uh, you can't use a lockmgr lock in interrupt handlers or in if_transmit/if_start routines. You should most likely just be using a plain mutex instead. Also, new code shouldn't use lockmgr in general. If you need a sleepable lock, use sx instead. It has a more straightforward API. > The problem seems to be at [2], somehow after swapping > buckets in uma_zfree m_dup returns a pointer to > an mbuf that is still being used by us, [1] and [3] > have same address. > Then we call m_freem twice on same mbuf, [4] and [5]. > And a loop occurs inside uma_free. > I am using mbufs in a wrong way? Shouldnt mbufs be thread safe? > Problem seems to occur while swapping buckets. Hmm, the uma uses its own locking, so it should be safe, yes. However, you are correct about [1] and [3]. The thing is, after [1] the mbuf shouldn't be in any buckets at all (it only gets put back into the bucket during a free). Are you sure the mbuf wasn't double free'd previously? -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
