On 30 May 2011 18:44, Dieter BSD <[email protected]> wrote: >> maybe we find some nice -Wwarning options which are reasonable >> to have > > -Wmissing-declarations > -Wimplicit > > FreeBSD's gcc doesn't seem to have -Wcoercion ??? > Bugzilla indicates that it was added years ago (2006?). > > It would be really really nice if -static worked on (nearly) everything. > >> and - most importantly - don't break tinderbox > > That's a matter of fixing the bugs before adding the warning flags > to tinderbox. > > Ports need attention. The warnings I get there are frightening.
I find it comforting that they're just that: warnings. How do they frighten you? Chris _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

