Hi. Andriy Gapon wrote: > I wonder if instead of calling statclock() multiple times (after an idle > period) > we couldn't call it just with an appropriate N parameter. > So some stats like e.g. cp_time[] could do +=N instead of ++. > Other stats ru_ixrss need to be updated only once. > Similarly, N could be passed further down to sched_clock() and handled there > too.
I think yes. It is reasonable. Initially hardclock() was also called in a loop. It was just rewritten first because it is called more often (more times), goes to hardware to sync time, and any way required changes to work properly. -- Alexander Motin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
