Hi,
I found this change kicking around my tree from a while back. It
brings the manpage for sigismember(3) more in line with the POSIX
definition [1] in the RETURN CODES section by explicitly noting that
sigismember(3) returns 0 if a signal is valid and not a part of the
set passed in.
If someone could review and commit the change, it would be much appreciated.
Thanks!
-Garrett[1] http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/sigismember.html (SUS Issue 6 -- but the wording for the manpage is the same in SUS Issue 7).
more-explicit-sigismember-return-codes.diff
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
