Ivan Voras <[email protected]> wrote: > fsync(2) actually does behave as advertised, "auses all modified > data and attributes of fd to be moved to a permanent storage > device". It is the problem of the "permanent storage device" > if it caches this data further.
IMO, volatile RAM without battery backup cannot reasonably be considered a "permanent storage device", regardless of where it is physically located. Short of mounting synchronously, with the attendant performance hit, would it not make sense for fsync(2) to issue ATA_FLUSHCACHE or SCSI "SYNCHRONIZE CACHE" after it has finished writing data to the drive? Surely the low-level capability to issue those commands must already exist, else we would have no way to safely prepare for power off. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
