> If syslogd is up and running (and the data gets stored before the system > dies) there is a good chance that syslogd will timestamp the messages.
I don't think this would be a good idea. Syslogd does a fine job of adding timestamps; there aren't any really relevant cases in which having timestamps added by the kernel would help where syslogd couldn't have done the job itself. This service doesn't belong in the kernel. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ [email protected] \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ [email protected] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
