https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=281182
Bug ID: 281182
Summary: www/firefox needs a
rustix/src/backend/libc/fs/syscalls.rs patch analogous
to the one under lang/rust/files/armv7/
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: Individual Port(s)
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
Assignee: [email protected]
Flags: maintainer-feedback?([email protected])
For rust 1.79.0_1 vs. firefox 129.0.2_2 , the only difference needed
for the content of the patch files was the file path:
# diff
/usr/ports/lang/rust/files/armv7/patch-vendor_rustix_src_backend_libc_fs_syscalls.rs
/usr/ports/www/firefox/files/patch-third__party_rust_rustix_src_backend_libc_fs_syscalls.rs
| more
5,6c5,6
< --- vendor/rustix-0.38.28/src/backend/libc/fs/syscalls.rs.orig
2024-05-06 16:29:17.182875000 +0200
< +++ vendor/rustix-0.38.28/src/backend/libc/fs/syscalls.rs 2024-05-06
16:29:48.897744000 +0200
---
> --- third_party/rust/rustix/src/backend/libc/fs/syscalls.rs.orig
> 2024-05-06 16:29:17.182875000 +0200
> +++ third_party/rust/rustix/src/backend/libc/fs/syscalls.rs 2024-05-06
> 16:29:48.897744000 +0200
But rust and firefox have progressed since then. However, a similar point
may well apply to the updated pair.
This will mat†er if someone ever tries to get armv7 firefox to build
(and work): This appears to be one of multiple things that are broken
for that context, one I happen to have figured out via a suggestion
someone made on a list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
