Scott Long wrote: > On Mar 20, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Alexander Motin wrote: >> As you should remember, we have made it in such way, that all unchecked >> drivers keep using DFLTPHYS, which is not going to be changed ever. So >> there is no problem. I would more worry about non-CAM storages and above >> stuff, like some rare GEOM classes. > > And that's why I say that everything needs to be audited. Are there CAM > drivers > that default to being silent on cpi->maxio, but still look at DFLTPHYS and > MAXPHYS?
If some (most of) drivers silent on cpi->maxio - they will be limited by safe level of DFLTPHYS, which should not be changed ever. There should be no problem. > Are there non-CAM drivers that look at MAXPHYS, or that silently assume that > MAXPHYS will never be more than 128k? That is a question. -- Alexander Motin _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
