In article <20100307.144736.420173476735197890....@bsdimp.com>, Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> writes:
>We don't have quite as many problems as the NetBSD/OpenBSD crowd in >this respect. They tend to define a new MACHIINE more often then we >have (or will). The need for sys/arch is less severe here than there >because we don't have 40 different MACHINEs. Even if we did, I cannot think of any compelling reason to make such a change (and I don't recall one ever being brought up in our entire history). If we had forty architecture directories in /sys, so what? Why should it matter to anyone? If we were talking about 100 architectures, I might feel differently, but in this universe, we have, what? eight? And there are how many architectures currently in mass production? This whole discussion is ridiculous. -GAWollman _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
