At 11:50 AM -0800 2003/11/25, Matthew Dillon wrote:

     ... Or you can build an IPC mechanism that implements the PAM
     functionality and then have programs which would otherwise use PAM
     instead use the IPC mechanism.  Which is the whole point of having
     the IPC mechanism in the first place.

That all sounds wonderful!


So, when are you going to deliver this fully functioning and debugged code for inclusion in FreeBSD-5.2?

--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to