On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > :I supported the decision because: > : > :1. It has been requested for years > :2. It benefits PAM and NSS. > :3. It is easy to revert. > > Easy to revert? You are talking about depending on mechanisms for > authentication and other things that WILL NOT WORK with static binaries > as they currently stand and, apparently, will not work in the > future either. Easy to revert? I don't think so. > > More like "Lets do away with support for static binaries entirely". > Because that is precisely what is happening here.
What the hell are you talking about???? _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
