"Robert M.Zigweid" wrote: > I'll admit to being mostly a lurker here, but isn't the point of /sbin > to be statically linked. That's what the 's' stands for? > > Second question. This seems to imply that /sbin and /bin both have to > have the same behavior? I have no problem with /bin being dynamically > linked, but what if I want /bin to be dynamic and /sbin static?
Since sbin on System V predated shared libraries on System V, I think maybe this is a reverse assignment of a meaning to the 's'. -- Terry _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
