Bill Vermillion wrote: > I would think that instead of NO_DYNAMICROOT root in make.conf, > a varialbe of DYNAMICROOT be used with the default of building > static, and having the option of building dynamic for those > who need to save those few MB of space. IOW don't change one of > the things that has made the BSD so rugged and reliable for so many > years.
Seconded ! Better commit an improved switch with default = Off. Richard Coleman wrote: > But I think the time for these discussions is passed. current@ is only a concensus of /usr/src developers. /usr/src & /usr/ports/ users on hackers@ ports@ isp@ may not have seen current@'s change ? that may make later net upgrades more problematic / dangerous. FreeBSD (non current) can be net upgraded to new releases without any /usr/src & /usr/obj on either remote target or local (keyboard) system, using merely an ftp'd new binary tree + `mv'. Will a safe new `ftp + mv' procedure be documented ? - Julian Stacey Freelance Systems Engineer, Unix & Net Consultant, Munich. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
