I found a PR that suggested adding:
{ 0x1050, "Intel 82801EB (ICH5) Pro/100 Ethernet" },line to the if_fxp.c file, in the struct:
/*
* Claim various Intel PCI device identifiers for this driver. The
* sub-vendor and sub-device field are extensively used to identify
* particular variants, but we don't currently differentiate between
* them.
*/
static struct fxp_ident fxp_ident_table[] = {
{ 0x1029, "Intel 82559 PCI/CardBus Pro/100" },
{ 0x1030, "Intel 82559 Pro/100 Ethernet" },
{ 0x1031, "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 VE Ethernet" },
{ 0x1032, "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 VE Ethernet" },
{ 0x1033, "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 VM Ethernet" },
{ 0x1034, "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 VM Ethernet" },
{ 0x1035, "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 Ethernet" },
{ 0x1036, "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 Ethernet" },
{ 0x1037, "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 Ethernet" },
{ 0x1038, "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 VM Ethernet" },
{ 0x1039, "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 VE Ethernet" },
{ 0x103A, "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 Ethernet" },
{ 0x103B, "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 VM Ethernet" },
{ 0x103C, "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 Ethernet" },
{ 0x103D, "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 VE Ethernet" },
{ 0x103E, "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 VM Ethernet" },
{ 0x1050, "Intel 82801EB (ICH5) Pro/100 Ethernet" },
{ 0x1059, "Intel 82551QM Pro/100 M Mobile Connection" },
{ 0x1209, "Intel 82559ER Embedded 10/100 Ethernet" },
{ 0x1229, "Intel 82557/8/9 EtherExpress Pro/100(B) Ethernet" },
{ 0x2449, "Intel 82801BA/CAM (ICH2/3) Pro/100 Ethernet" },
{ 0, NULL },
};-Derek
At 07:15 PM 9/26/2003 -0500, Derek Ragona wrote:
Mine is an Intel® Server Board S875WP1-E, I was using a patch but it quite working on the fxp0 interface.
-Derek
At 08:07 PM 9/26/2003 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Are they Tyan motherboards by chance ? There was a thread in stable about this a few weeks ago. The problems seem specific to those motherboards. Someone posted a potential workaround as well.
---Mike
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:40:08 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.current you wrote:
>I am having a problem with recent builds of -current with the fxp >driver. A couple of days ago, the 6 machines in my cluster with fxp >interfaces all died at about the same time with fxp timeout errors. The >machines with 3Com xl interfaces kept on going. Today, I am observing >that the throughput is about half of what I am seeing on my machines >with a 3Com xl interface. Is anybody else observing this? What other >information do I need to provide? > >Thanks.
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
