Le 2003-09-16, Daniel Eischen écrivait : > I get this even without atapicam in the kernel. Is trying > CAMDEBUG and CAM_DEBUG_CDB going to show anything interesting?
No, indeed, probably not. Can you try the following patch:
Index: ata-lowlevel.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-lowlevel.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.11 ata-lowlevel.c
--- ata-lowlevel.c 10 Sep 2003 09:57:16 -0000 1.11
+++ ata-lowlevel.c 16 Sep 2003 15:00:13 -0000
@@ -374,6 +374,11 @@
/* ATAPI PIO commands */
case ATA_R_ATAPI:
+ if (request->status & (ATA_S_ERROR | ATA_S_DWF)) {
+ request->error = ATA_IDX_INB(ch, ATA_ERROR);
+ break;
+ }
+
length = ATA_IDX_INB(ch, ATA_CYL_LSB)|(ATA_IDX_INB(ch, ATA_CYL_MSB)<<8);
switch ((ATA_IDX_INB(ch, ATA_IREASON) & (ATA_I_CMD | ATA_I_IN)) |
@@ -446,8 +451,6 @@
case ATAPI_P_ABORT:
case ATAPI_P_DONE:
- if (request->status & (ATA_S_ERROR | ATA_S_DWF))
- request->error = ATA_IDX_INB(ch, ATA_ERROR);
break;
default:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
