<<On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 16:04:40 -0700, David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Yep, looks broken. In the POSIX standard, the functionality of > statfs() is provided by statvfs(), so implementing the latter may > be a way out that doesn't involve breaking any ABIs. statfs() is a lot more useful interface than statvfs(). I'd like to keep statvfs() as the ``standard'' interface, rather than extending it to cover all of the information that statfs() has. In order to grow statfs() we need to rev libc. It might be appropriate to do that in the 5.2 time frame, if we are still anticipating that 5.2 will be the -stable crossover point. RE team? -GAWollman _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
