I've been running 5.1-Current since its release on a Dell Precision 410 with dual P-III 500's No SMP problems here at all.. Its been extremely stable for me thus far.
Darin - -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Kargl Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 7:10 PM To: Andy Farkas Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Eriq Lamar Subject: Re: smp in 5.1 On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:25:38AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote: > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Eriq Lamar wrote: > > > Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so > > could someone tell what they are. I am interested in building dual > > system using mp's but not sure which version would be better. > > Scheduling in 5.1 is broken (sched_ule doesn't even work*). > > Stick with 4.8. > > * for me, sched_ule completely locks up my box, no ping, no keybd. > Exact same kernel with sched_4bsd works fine. > Strange. ULE has worked fine on my UP system for several months and the SMP system I recently obtained from a co-worker hasn't panicked while running ULE. Can you drop into ddb and trace the problem with ULE on your system? -- Steve _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
