On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 01:42, Terry Lambert wrote: > I do know that even if they remove the bridge, they are unlikely > to provide enough documentation to boot and run natively on the > hardware without having IBM code setting up the bus arbitration > and other bits that are currently undocumented.
Why would IBM try to hide this? Wouldn't they *want* people to take full advantage of the processor for the best performance to help give their product a good image? -- Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://drevil.warpcore.org/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
