"Jacques A. Vidrine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [For some reason I haven't seen Alexander's post yet, so I'm mixing > replies here.] > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:12:10PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > On Friday 18 July 2003 17:37, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > > On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:33:58 -0500 > > > > > > "Jacques A. Vidrine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I also recall lots of missing `typename's in the system headers that > > > > were resolved in the actual GCC distribution. > > > > > > > > Alexander, do the STL headers et. al. get updated with the rest of the > > > > compiler chain? > > > > > > Yes. But libstdc++ itself lags a bit behind GCC features. The reason why > > > GCC ports are not reporting any errors is because by default GCC > > > suppresses warnings from system headers, and C++ headers are considered > > > system. We disable this suppression in imported compiler. [snip]
Curiosity: Why does this suppression get disabled in the imported compiler? _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
