On Friday 18 July 2003 17:37, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:33:58 -0500 > > "Jacques A. Vidrine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I also recall lots of missing `typename's in the system headers that > > were resolved in the actual GCC distribution. > > > > Alexander, do the STL headers et. al. get updated with the rest of the > > compiler chain? > > Yes. But libstdc++ itself lags a bit behind GCC features. The reason why > GCC ports are not reporting any errors is because by default GCC > suppresses warnings from system headers, and C++ headers are considered > system. We disable this suppression in imported compiler.
I guess the next question is whether this is fixable, maybe even by enabling
said supression, at least for a short while. It seems the better fix than to
go and remove -pedantic from all the helloworlds that may linger in the
ports-tree.
--
Michael Nottebrock \ KDE on FreeBSD \ ,ww
\ --- \ ,wWWCybaWW_)
\ http://freebsd.kde.org \ `WSheepW' free
\ II II node
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
