On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 10:11:09AM +0100, Dominic Marks wrote: > Ok, can you explain why it was trying to find the pam_get_pass symbol > which was removed from the module (by a port patch) and not mentioned in > OpenPAM? I assume OpenPAM is looking in the module, catching a stray > reference to it and then slipping up from here?
The patch doesn't remove references to pam_get_pass(); it removes the port's own implementation of pam_get_pass() under the assumption that libpam provides one (which it no longer does). I'm afraid it's simply not going to work on -CURRENT without heavy modification... It relies too heavily on old glue code which has been removed. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
