In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: >Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: >> +-------[ Poul-Henning Kamp ]---------------------- >> | >> | I think we need somebody to reconsider how we configure our filesystems >> | in the future, in order to avoid a confusion of config files whose >> | interrelationship users will have no chance of figuring out. >> | >> | We have CCD, GBDE, MD and in the future likely other technologies for >> | configuring the underlying devices, we have FSCK, UFS and NFS and >> | other filesystems to mount. >> | >> | Somebody must be able to come up with some creative stuff here... ? >> >> We want .... >> >> A REGISTRY! >> >> Ni! Ni! Ni! Ni! Ni! Ni! > >Bah. Add a prerequisites field to fstab with all the filesystems that >must be mounted before that one can be mounted.
That's not enough. I have filesystems I don't want fscked/mounted until after sshd will accept my login for instance (I hate waiting for a fsck of /home/ncvs...) (Yes yes yes, bgfsck improves things a bit). Please don't hack /etc/fstab yet another time, please try to do it in a future-proof way (which doesn't suck) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
