On Monday, 24 March 2003 at 19:07:56 -0500, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> Hi Gang!
>
> I was wondering, what's the point of making Vinum use a totally
> different SYSINIT type?  Isn't there a possibility it can just use
> SI_SUB_RAID?

Probably.  SI_SUB_VINUM was there first.

Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to